ON WHAT GROUNDS COULD A SOCIALIST CRITICISE THE LIBERALS FOCUS ON INDIVIDUALISM?
1 . Format what Liberals (like Locke) say regarding individualism and individual liberty and why they value it. installment payments on your Outline the results of this – INEQUALITY – and how come individualism inevitably leads to inequality 3. State that Socialists have got (traditionally) valued equality most importantly and declare why. four. Conclude that is why they will oppose individuality – but add that a lot of modern Socialists have customized their look at and now respect equality of opportunity since more important – which is far more compatible with individuality.
DISTINGUISH BETWEEN ‘EQUALITY OF OUTCOME' AND ‘EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY' AND OUTLINE JUST HOW LIBERALS AND SOCIALISTS HAVE GOT APPROACHED THESE TYPES OF IDEAS.
1 . Begin by defining both terms and their consequences -- -(a)equality of outcome sama dengan making persons more similar in terms of profits, wealth and in many cases power – the levelling up or down favoured by traditional Socialists and Communists (b)equality of opportunity = everyone is given precisely the same chance in every area of your life (life chances) but from then on its about them the actual make of this – favoured by liberals and modern Socialists (Third Way). The 2 ideas are incompatible because equality of chance can lead to great inequality ultimately. 2 . Usually those in favour of equality of outcome sama dengan Communists and Socialists – say why 3. Customarily those in preference of equality of opportunity = liberals and some Conservatives (mostly One Region, Christian democrats and now Modernisers) 4. Yet – modern Socialists or perhaps New Labour now seem to favour equality of chance no result – claim why.
SO WHY DO LIBERALS VALUE INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY OVER EQUALITY?
Not difficult –
1 . Outline the basic tolerante values which usually focus on individual freedom and individualism – spell out in detail what they claim about this and why. 2 . Outline quickly arguments pertaining to equality – and how come liberals believe this might destruction individual...